Certainly. I'll bet we all agree spring grass is usually green and a clear sky usually blue, objects fall to the earth at approximately 32 feet per second per second, and Audrey Tautou is beautiful. Just for starters.
Is there a question to which you all would give the same - or almost the same - answer?
I certainly can't speak authoritatively for the opinion of anyone other than myself, but it seems to me that everyone can easily be convinced to agree that if something is, then it is; and also that nothing can both be and not be at the same time and in the same way. In other words, the Laws of Logic are valid.
An interesting point to note, however, is that holding to the Laws of Logic can only be rationally justified under Christian assumptions.
Polytheism insists that things that are may not be, making the Laws of Logic invalid under polytheism.
Pantheism equates God with the universe, demanding that multiple parts are all equally ultimate, thus prohibiting any kind of universal authority and denying the rationality of universal truth claims.
Unitarianism rejects the idea that God is His own reason for His actions, thereby rejecting a rational God altogether, falling into the same irrational trap atheism demands.
Any Monotheistic worldview without a divine atoning sacrifice insists that debts can actually be paid by one who has nothing to pay debts with, again making the Laws of Logic invalid.
Christianity alone stands coherent, allowing for the possibility of knowledge via the validity of the Laws of Logic.
Why would your book refer to Jesus as "the Messiah" but only in passing as if it is just a nickname? Why is this major "controversy" not addressed and discussed in the Quran "in detail" as it should have been as per 27:76, 16
What is Takeyya? Is it okay for Muslims to lie?
Do humans and plants have the same free will?
How is God any different than Santa Claus?
Answers: Muslim, Atheist, Christian
If Allah is the Greatest Deceiver of all (S. 3:54), how can you trust anything He says?